Update regarding Oregon Residency

LCC Faculty Colleagues,

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team met with the College today and reached an agreement on the College’s plan to implement an Oregon residency requirement. The terms of the agreement are listed below. Essentially, the agreement postpones negotiations over this issue to our regular contract negotiations, which are scheduled to begin in February. The agreement ensures that any faculty member living outside of Oregon has protections and full assignment rights under the contract through the end of regular contract bargaining, at least. Any faculty member who does not have an up-to-date address on file with LCC must update it within ExpressLane by December 31, 2024 to preserve your rights and so that we can best represent you in future negotiations.

  1. College may include Oregon residency requirement in new job postings effective immediately.
  2. College and LCCEA agree to negotiate over the issue of an Oregon residency requirement in successor CBA negotiations.
  3. Any faculty member who has an out-of-state address at this time, including any new hire for Winter 2025, shall not be required to live in Oregon until successor CBA negotiations are complete and an agreement about this issue is reached.
  4. All faculty members shall have through December 31, 2024 to update their address with LCC.
  5. LCCEA shall remove this Oregon residency requirement issue from the pending ULP complaint.

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team

Jason Ambacher, GIS

Adrienne Mitchell, ALS

April Myler, Nursing

Ken Volante, OEA

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Update for All Faculty: Administration Provided Notice Today of Two New Requirements for Faculty

LCC Faculty Colleagues,

I hope your week 4 is going well so far! I have much news to share in a future update about the exciting contributions of faculty on LCCEA teams as we prepare for contract negotiations in Winter and celebrate 50 years of member organizing power with the GOLD Dinner & Workshop Series. (Register here for November events and beyond.)

In the meantime, I am writing to let you know about two new requirements that the Administration is seeking to impose for faculty.

First, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Shelley Tinkham, provided notice to LCCEA today that LCC will implement a requirement effective January 20, 2025 that all faculty must reside in the state of Oregon. The Administration had recently informed LCCEA on September 23, 2024 that they would not implement such a requirement. However, they have since reversed course and now seek to require all faculty to “maintain and permanently reside in a principal place of residence in the State of Oregon,” noting that a violation of the procedure would cause any employee to be “subject to discipline, up to and including termination of college employment.” See “Employee Residency” below for details. 

A small number of LCC faculty live outside Oregon, including some for many years and some who have lived outside of Oregon for their entire employment at LCC. We will be reaching out to all faculty who have an official address on record that is outside the state. In addition, we will be seeking legal advice on this issue, which has a significant impact on a limited number of faculty members. Faculty may also share questions, concerns, or other feedback about the Oregon residency requirement on this form.

Second, VPAA Shelley Tinkham also provided notice to LCCEA today that the Administration will impose a new requirement effective January 20, 2025 that all contracted faculty must report their non-teaching work / non-teaching activities and estimated hours for each activity every term, to be submitted on a quarterly “Faculty Non-Teaching Workload Form.” See below “Non-Teaching Work Procedure” for details. Please share any feedback you have about this new requirement to report and estimate non-teaching work on this form.

In order to preserve faculty rights, LCCEA has provided notice to the College of our intent to bargain over the impacts of these two new requirements. According to state law, LCC is required to negotiate over impacts of any changes to working conditions that it seeks to impose and must engage in good faith negotiation for 90 days prior to implementation of the changes.

Please note that these changes are ones that we would typically expect to see the College propose during regular contract negotiations, which will begin around February. By providing the notice now, the Administration circumvents our regular, upcoming negotiations in order to implement the changes immediately prior to beginning the main contract bargaining. This is not a strategy that the Administration at LCC has ever utilized in the past.

In addition, LCCEA has notified the College that the non-teaching work reporting and tracking requirement that the Administration seeks to impose is a violation of our contract, which confirms that faculty are “professional employees.”  Faculty are salaried, not hourly* employees, and our contract specifies that, “Because faculty are exempt and not hourly employees, non-teaching work is not tracked on an hourly basis.” (Also see excerpt from Art. 35 below this message.)

We will also be consulting with legal counsel regarding the relationship of the timing of these notices to good faith bargaining and regarding employer implementation of a requirement that is not consistent with the contract as that may also be inconsistent with state law (i.e., an unfair labor practice).

Your LCCEA Representatives from both the Bargaining and Grievance Teams will be sharing more information as it becomes available. In the meantime, please do feel free to share your feedback on the two forms provided and/or reach out with questions.

Sincerely,

Adrienne

Adrienne Mitchell, M.A., M.Ed.

Faculty Member, Academic Learning Skills Department

President, Lane Community College Education Association

Vice President, Oregon Education Association Community College Council

*If faculty were hourly employees, we would be subject to wage and hour laws such as overtime pay. Faculty would track our hours and/or punch a time clock, and any time a contracted faculty member worked more than 40 hours per week (e.g., during those late nights grading or prepping on the weekend), faculty would be paid overtime. Likewise, if faculty were hourly employees, part-time faculty working more hours than they are compensated for based on their teaching FTE would be paid for every hour of work in service of students and the campus.

Excerpt from Article 35:

Article 35 – WORKLOAD

35.2 Nature of Non-Teaching Work. The workload of contracted teaching faculty is intended to include an amount of non-teaching work. The choice of specific

non-teaching faculty work shall be the decision of the faculty member and can be made without prejudice, subject to the ability of the college to accomplish non-teaching work as specified by this Agreement, properly executed Memoranda of Agreements, certified workgroup charters, and workgroup consensus decisions.

35.3 Non-Teaching Work. Non-teaching workload consists of activities beyond directed student contact time and immediate class work, which includes preparation, grading, office hours, and examining student work.

35.3.1 Faculty are professional employees exempt per ORS 653.020 from overtime compensation. Non-teaching workload shall apply to contracted faculty only, and shall comprise 15% of the faculty member’s FTE, averaged over the academic year. Because faculty are exempt and not hourly employees, non-teaching work is not tracked on an hourly basis. However, for the purpose of providing an example, 15% for a faculty member teaching 1.0 FTE equates to an average of six hours per contract week. If such activities cannot be accommodated within this schedule, the particular workload issues will

be raised to the Division/Department Chair as outlined in 35.4. If the workload issue is not resolved through the Department/Division Chair process the issue may be raised to the LCCEA President and the Vice President for Instruction and Student Services via the process outlined in Article 35.4.

35.3.2 In this Article, non-teaching work is work that is not otherwise compensated and is focused on furthering the college mission and goals at a program, department/division or college-wide level. This non-teaching work includes such things as long-term curriculum planning, development and coordination; assessment of student learning outcomes; governance activities; working as an Association representative in joint activities; serving on hiring committees; participation in peer evaluation and peer mentoring processes; building collegiality; and work in the community.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

LCCEA Emails Board Regarding Improving Labor – Management Relations

Note: The following are copies of email communications from LCCEA President Adrienne Mitchell and LCCEA Officers to Lane Board Chair Mullholland and the Board sent on September 29, 2024 and September 3, 2024.

Chair Mullholland and Esteemed Board members,

I am writing to let you know as a courtesy that LCCEA had to file another unfair labor practice complaint last week regarding two issues. 

One of the unfair labor practice issues is about LCC’s refusal to bargain over impacts of changes to minimum qualifications in the ABSE and ESL departments. These changes affect mandatory subjects of bargaining, which means that LCC is legally obligated to negotiate over the impacts. After four and a half months seeking information, requesting collaborative meetings, and proposing solutions and making settlement offers, LCCEA has not yet been able to receive clear, definitive responses, nor have we received any counter offers or settlement proposals from LCC. To date, LCC has agreed to only one meeting, which included minimal discussion of the substantive issues. (As reported previously, there are also separate issues related to compensation for required training affecting faculty in ABSE and ESL, which are scheduled for an arbitration hearing (i.e., a hearing to adjudicate an alleged contract violation).)

The second unfair labor practice issue is related to email communication sent from management directly to faculty members containing inaccurate information, false allegations, and admonishing LCCEA for engaging in protected union activity advocating on behalf of faculty members, which the union is legally obligated to do and which LCCEA has done at the express request of affected faculty members who were rightfully concerned about their job security. 

This takes place against a backdrop of broader concerns where the May 2024 Gallup campus climate survey of all LCC employees results indicate that LCC ranks in only the 5th percentile nationwide on the question, “If I raised a concern about ethics and integrity, I am confident my employer would do what is right” and the 8th percentile on the question, “Everyone at this institution is treated fairly regardless of individual differences, such as ethnic background, race, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity.” 

The second unfair labor practice issue is precisely what our officers were concerned about when we wrote to you all as our esteemed, publicly elected Board of Education in early September (below and attached) regarding the plans laid out in the LCC President’s goals that the Board has now approved.  In that letter, we expressed strong support for the overall goal of improving labor relations but also shared concerns that the steps outlined to achieve that goal would be divisive, would negatively impact campus climate, and would likely lead to further unlawful activity by LCC. 

We were disappointed to see this concern come to fruition with a new unfair labor practice by LCC less than two weeks after the Board voted on the goals.

We remain concerned about substantial state funding & student tuition dollars being expended on outside attorneys by LCC due to ongoing unfair labor practice activity and other increasing legal fees LCC is paying. This is not what faculty want for our campus or our community. 

We will continue advocating for collaborative labor relations. This is not something LCCEA representatives can accomplish on our own —  it’s necessary for LCC to become a willing partner in that collaboration. 

We do deeply appreciate your support as the Board for improving labor relations as a goal. We continue to recommend the strategies outlined in our message (below) on September 3 to you all as productive, lawful ways to improve labor relations, which must include working directly with and collaborating directly with union representatives. We seek your leadership to provide the much needed direction for LCC to prioritize collaboration, to seek resolution to issues at the lowest level possible, and to actively participate in the steps required to achieve collaborative resolutions. 

As always, thank you for your dedicated volunteer service on the Board and to the people of Lane County. 

Sincerely,

Adrienne

Chair Mulholland and Board of Education Members,

Please find below and attached a message from the LCCEA faculty along with two appendices. We ask that you kindly forward this to Board member Wiseman, whom we look forward to welcoming but who does not yet have email contact information posted on BoardDocs. Thank you. 

September 3, 2024

Esteemed Board of Education Members,

As we close out the Labor Day weekend with appreciation for our members’ advocacy for and dedication to our students, our faculty from historically oppressed groups, our community, and our broader democracy, we look forward to a new academic year with better learning and working conditions on campus.

We are writing on behalf of faculty to express our support for improving labor relations, which sadly have deteriorated dramatically and rapidly over recent years, at our beloved Lane Community College.

For instance, during the 23-24 academic year, LCCEF classified professionals nearly went on strike after mediation stagnated when LCCEF had not gone to mediation over bargaining for approximately 10 years. During the same year numerous unfair labor practice charges were filed by LCCEA due to LCC retaliation against faculty union members and representatives; direct dealing by LCC with faculty members; and unlawful interference by LCC with the union, which went to a four-day hearing in May after more than two decades without a single unfair labor practice hearing. (See also the appendices.)

We are heartened that the LCC President’s draft goals include improving labor relations.

However, we are deeply concerned that the steps outlined to foster positive labor relations will not only contribute to further deterioration of labor relations and increased conflict (and likely continued escalating legal fees incurred by LCC), the steps and metrics outlined in the draft goals will most likely also result in additional unfair labor practices by LCC.

We ask for your leadership and direction to change this course.

The facts illustrate the significant increase in labor strife as well as the dramatically increasing amounts that LCC is spending on outside attorneys for faculty labor disputes*. (*No data is publicly available on outside attorneys for other issues.)

As you will see on the chart below, the amount that LCC has paid to attorneys for labor disputes with faculty has increased tenfold since FY21. (Data Source: Information provided directly to LCCEA by LCC Administration and HR). These are precious taxpayer and student tuition dollars that could be devoted to the college mission rather than legal fees. 

In addition, LCC has been represented by at least five different attorneys over this time period, including at least one who declined to continue representing LCC after their experience working with the college representatives. Currently, LCC is represented by an attorney based in the state of Wisconsin. All these factors contribute to instability in labor relations, rather than collaboration and productive resolutions.

In addition, the number of issues that have escalated to level one grievances (i.e., formal contractual violations), unfair labor practice complaints filed with the state, and/or arbitration or other hearings have also increased dramatically from one in 21-22 to twelve in 23-24. 

Escalated Labor Disputes with Faculty
YearTotal Number of Disputes
FY221
FY235
FY2412

Please note that over these years, the number of informal level issues that have arisen has remained roughly the same. Likewise, the leadership of LCCEA and teams working on these issues have remained the same as has our goal of proactively preventing issues from happening and productively and collaboratively resolving issues at the lowest level when they do occur. We have experienced a marked difference in the management approach, which has led to fewer meetings and discussions, far fewer issues resolved at the informal level, and ultimately increased escalation and legal fees that the College must bear. Every hearing over this time period has resulted in a favorable outcome for LCCEA, further underscoring the need for collaborative problem solving and a management commitment to resolve issues at the lowest level. 

Steps to improve labor relations should necessarily include working collaboratively and directly with the unions. Circumventing the unions to engage the “college community” in discussions and “dialogue” about labor relations through “meetings,” “surveys,” and “monthly updates” is not only counter-productive and divisive, it is likely to be found unlawful under Oregon’s Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act. 

We ask you, the members of the Board of Education, to allow for more time to amend the goals and to provide leadership to encourage collaboration and dispute resolution at the lowest levels.

We recommend the following as steps and metrics for improving labor – management relations. 

  • President should commit to provide leadership to administrators and managers, setting the expectation and directive for management to (1) collaborate with the unions; (2) to work productively to seek to resolve issues at the lowest level possible; and (3) to follow all legal obligations, including but not limited to: providing notice to the unions whenever there is a change that could impact employee working conditions, meeting to bargain in good faith, meeting to resolve contract issues (i.e., grievances), etc. Evidence could include memos to management staff documenting the new expectation for collaboration.
  • Decreased legal costs incurred by LCC with evidence including regular updates on legal bills
  • Reduced litigation; significantly reduced number of issues going to arbitration or other hearing(s)
  • Required regular training for managers and administrators on state labor law and immediate discontinuation of all unfair labor practices
  • Required, jointly union-management developed and provided training to managers on the contracts

As leaders for the faculty, we are deeply committed to productive labor relations. Productive labor relations are also positive for our campus, our students, and our community.

Productive labor relations also require a demonstrated commitment from management and your explicit direction and guidance to set the tone and expectations. In short, we need a willing partner.

As the supreme governing body at Lane Community College, elected to represent the people of Lane County, voters and community members are counting on you as our Board members to provide direction to the President and to the entire campus and to create the college our community deserves.

While unions enjoy near highest public approval ratings since the 1960 according to a recent Gallup poll and new unions in higher education have surged tremendously, the timing could not be more apropos for you to provide leadership and direction with a renewed focus on better labor relations.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service on the Board.

Most sincerely,

LCCEA Officers, representing the part-time and full-time faculty of Lane Community College

Adrienne Mitchell, LCCEA President

April Myler, LCCEA Secretary

Wendy Rawlinson, LCCEA Treasurer

Wendy Simmons, LCCEA VIce President At-Large

Christina Howard, LCCEA Vice President for Career Technical Faculty

Rosa Lopez, LCCEA Vice President for Learning Advancement

Peggy Oberstaller, LCCEA Vice President for Part-time Faculty

Kate Sullivan, LCCEA Vice President for Transfer Faculty

and

Ken Volante, OEA Representative

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Welcome to Fall Term ’24!

This past week, the LCCEA sponsored two social events to bring faculty together in anticipation of the new academic year. On September 19, some 30 faculty and their friends/families gathered at the Bier Stein for appetizers and conversation, and then on Thursday September 26, more than 100 faculty gathered at the LCC Longhouse for the kickoff meeting of the year including an ice cream social. Check back for more details of what’s in store this year and to learn about celebration of the LCCEA’s GOLD Anniversary!

Posted in General | Leave a comment

This Thursday: Fall Welcome Gathering

Thursday, September 19, Fall Welcome Gathering

Join colleagues, welcome new faculty, and celebrate with winners of the selfie contest at the end of the first day of the Inservice at the Bier Stein at 1591 Willamette St., Eugene with appetizers hosted by LCCEA, plus a no-host bar. Taps include alcoholic and non-alcoholic options such as cider and kombucha. Family members and all ages are welcome. Meet in the back section, reserved for LCCEA faculty.

We will begin immediately following the end of in-service activities, no later than 5:15 and host until 6:30.

Posted in General | Leave a comment