First Bargaining Proposals

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team meets with the College today at 1:00-4:00 in 2/214. All faculty are welcome to attend bargaining sessions, all or any part of a session, as silent observers.

Above: LCCEA Action Team and Bargaining Team Leads Working for a Fair Contract

LCC Faculty Colleagues –

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team Leads met on May 8 for its first “real” bargaining session where we exchanged proposals that were the first part of a four-part series of initial proposals by each party in accordance with our ground rules. Other proposals exchanged so far are also posted here on the blog.

We presented Part A of our initial package proposal (below), which is the section focused on student needs. In addition, we presented our proposal that the contract be a seven-year agreement with the economics set for the first three years, followed by two economic reopeners for two years each, as well as a proposal that the full contract utilize gender neutral language.

The Student Needs section includes: 

  • Increase support for student basic needs (i.e. food, housing, safe physical campus spaces); 
  • Ensure adequate staffing for student services (i.e., counseling/mental health, advising, tutoring) 
  • Reduce costs for students (i.e. textbook markup reduction, OER support, tuition waiver for DACA and undocumented students); 
  • Expand sanctuary campus provisions and use LCC Alert when ICE is on campus; 
  • Improve safety of physical campus (e.g., sufficient emergency call boxes); 
  • Provide sufficient restrooms (i.e. more than one restroom stall per building); 
  • Make campus more inclusive (i.e., sufficient gender neutral restrooms, open worship spaces, lactation spaces, complete a study of LCC name);
  • Provide an instructional specialist in classes with significant percentage of students with ADA accommodations; and
  • Create an appeal process for accommodations that fundamentally alter course. 

The College’s proposal (also below) includes:

  • A contract in effect for two years only;
  • A “complete agreement clause,” which would eliminate all previous agreements about the meaning of the contract (i.e., past practice) and would eliminate all MOAs not negotiated or incorporated into the new agreement;
  • New provisions for “budget exigency” which would allow the College to open the contract and renegotiate salaries at any time if any one of the ten circumstances they proposed were triggered, all ten of which would be determined by the Administration alone;
  • Establishment of accrual families for the Florence campus for part-time faculty seniority, which would include classes taught in Florence and also classes taught entirely online, which have no physical location;
  • Establishment of the Oregon residency requirement for all faculty with no exceptions.

As you can see, the proposals are wildly disconnected and quite distant at this early point. 

Your faculty bargaining team leads are dedicated to achieving the best contract to meet faculty and student needs.

Thank you to the many faculty who attended today’s session to observe in person and on Zoom!

All bargaining sessions are scheduled in building 2, room 214, including TODAY! Upcoming dates are as follows.

  1. May 29, 1-4
  2. June 5, 1-4

We look forward to seeing you soon.

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team Leads,

Gerry Meenaghan

Adrienne Mitchell

April Myler

Peggy Oberstaller

Ryan Olds

Russell Shitabata

Kellen Wilson

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Bargaining Update: Faculty Needs & Safety

LCC Faculty Colleagues –

Your LCCEA Bargaining Leads met with the Administration for bargaining again today. We exchanged proposals that are the third part of a four-part series of initial proposals. We will be presenting all our remaining initial proposals next Thursday, May 29, including economic proposals.

We presented Part C of our initial package proposal (attached), which includes proposals on: no subcontracting, expanded protections against discrimination, stronger privacy protections, essentials for faculty working conditions, and campus lockdown safety. 

Our LCCEA faculty proposal includes:

  • Protections against subcontracting of faculty work (Art. 4);
  • Expanded protections against discrimination and recourse when discrimination occurs (Art. 7);
  • Stronger privacy protection for faculty files, messages, and media (Art. 16);
  • Essentials for faculty working conditions, including private offices, up-to-date hardware and software, adequate IT support, funding and release time for a transition to a new LMS such as Canvas, sufficient funding for the instructional and student services mission of the college, and provisions to enhance ethics, integrity, and inclusiveness of hiring processes (new Art. 43); 
  • Provisions on AI that protect faculty academic freedom rights to choose to use or not use AI in faculty work, protection against supplanting faculty work with AI, privacy protections when accommodations require faculty be recorded for an accommodation, and reasonable consideration of climate impacts of AI (new Art. 43); and
  • Lockdown safety language, including a safety plan, classroom upgrades, training, and benefits to affected faculty and their family members in the event of injury or death in a tragedy (new Art. 45).

We shared a presentation with data from our All faculty surveys to underscore the needs and interests our proposals seek to address. In addition, we shared a memo that LCC’s general counsel sent to the LCC President and campus community back in 2023, which identifies many critical needs and steps that the College should take in order to be better prepared for a lock down, which align with our proposal on lockdown safety.

The College’s proposal presented today:

  • Would eliminate several MOAs, including eliminating the Distance Learning MOA (College cover page);
  • Change the contracted faculty work year by reducing the total number of paid non-instructional and class prep days from five to four (College Art. 9);
  • Require manager approval for part-time faculty to use inservice hours to attend meetings or workshops on campus (College Art. 9);
  • Make the Association’s Fall All Faculty Meeting unpaid time (College Art. 9); and
  • Revise their initial salary schedule placement for all faculty (College Art. 27).

After we raised concerns yesterday about how the College’s proposal, which would have lowered initial salary placement for new faculty, would not be consistent with Oregon’s Equal Pay Act, the Administration presented a revised proposal today to remedy those concerns, which is a good step in the right direction. 

The remaining proposals, however, appear to be more take backs in that the paid class prep/ non-instructional time for contracted faculty would be reduced. Similarly, part-time faculty would be subject to more close management with approval required for part-time faculty to use their in-service hours for meetings or workshops.

Thank you to the many faculty who attended today’s session to observe in person and on Zoom. All faculty are welcome to attend.

All bargaining sessions are scheduled in building 2, room 214. Upcoming dates are as follows. Please note the new dates added for June and September.

  1. May 29, 1-4
  2. June 5, 1-4
  3. June 26, 1-4
  4. Sept 11, 1-4
  5. Sept 30, 1-4

We look forward to seeing you soon.

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team Leads,

Gerry Meenaghan

Adrienne Mitchell

April Myler

Peggy Oberstaller

Ryan Olds

Russell Shitabata

Kellen Wilson

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bargaining Update: College Proposes Numerous Take-Backs

LCC Faculty Colleagues –

Your LCCEA Bargaining Leads met with the Administration for bargaining again today. We exchanged proposals that are the second part of a four-part series of initial proposals by each party in accordance with our ground rules.

We presented Part B of our initial package proposal (below), which includes proposals on: job security, year-long assignments for part-time faculty, Florence accrual families, public health safety, and Oregon residency. 

Our LCCEA faculty proposal includes:

  • Protections for faculty when minimum qualifications change, including time and funding to meet any newly required qualifications, retaining job security for pre-existing certifications, and an appeal process for faculty seeking certification (Art. 44);
  • The requirement that the College assign available courses to part-time faculty with seniority by the end of Spring for the following academic year (Art. 34);
  • The establishment of accrual families for part-time faculty teaching in Florence in a fair and equitable manner (Art. 34);
  • The requirement that the College follow safety guidelines in the event of any external public health requirements (e.g. CDC, OHA)  (new Art. 46); and
  • The provision of an appeal process and several exemptions to the requirement that faculty reside in Oregon, including protection for existing faculty living outside the state, program needs, and other fair, reasonable exceptions (new Art. 47).

The College’s proposal presented today would (below):

  • Reduce initial salary schedule placement and reduce the maximum initial salary step for new part-time and full-time faculty (College Art. 27);
  • Allow the College to change the definition of the academic year to any three consecutive terms and allow the College to assign both part-time and full-time faculty to a work year that could include summer as one of the three “academic year” terms (College Art. 1);
  • Would change the threshold for contracted salary rates to 0.75 FTE such that anyone working 0.75 or lower would be paid at part-time faculty salary rates (College Art. 1);
  • Reduce the notice time required for contracted faculty layoffs such that layoffs could take place at any time of the year with only 60 calendar days’ notice (College Art. 10);
  • Eliminate the minimum number of full-time faculty positions (College Art. 10);
  • Allow any faculty member to teach community or adult education classes but at salary rates determined unilaterally by the Administration, which could be as low as minimum wage (College Art. X); and
  • Eliminate fifteen MOAs (College Proposal Intro page).

We raised concerns about how the College’s proposal, which lowers initial salary placement for new faculty, would not be consistent with Oregon’s Equal Pay Act. The Administration stated they would review our concerns and get back to us at a later date. 

In addition, we raised concerns about a notice we recently received from the Administration indicating that they would revise workload calculations unilaterally outside of bargaining. At the table today, we explained that workload is a mandatory subject of bargaining, which means that the College is legally obligated to negotiate over it. We asked for confirmation that the College representatives understand and agree. We have not yet received confirmation.

Your faculty bargaining leads remain dedicated to achieving the best contract in solidarity with all faculty members.

Thank you to the many faculty who attended today’s session to observe in person and on Zoom.

All bargaining sessions are scheduled in building 2, room 214. Upcoming dates are as follows. Please note the new dates added for June and September.

  1. May 23, 12-2
  2. May 29, 1-4
  3. June 5, 1-4
  4. June 26, 1-4
  5. Sept 11, 1-4
  6. Sept 30, 1-4

We look forward to seeing you soon.

Your LCCEA Bargaining Team Leads,

Gerry Meenaghan

Adrienne Mitchell

April Myler

Peggy Oberstaller

Ryan Olds

Russell Shitabata

Kellen Wilson

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Essential Information on the LCC budget Provided to the Board and their Budget Committee

LCC Faculty Colleagues —

Please find below essential information on the LCC budget provided to the Board and their Budget Committee. As you will see from the data provided in the official fiscal audits from fiscal years 21 through 23 and for fiscal years 24 through present, provided by the LCC’s Budget administrators, there is no structural deficit. Instead, the ending fund balance (i.e., reserves) has been increasing, not decreasing. In fact, the general fund ending fund balance has increased 14.4% in the past two years.

EndingFundBalances.jpg

It is both unfortunate and unnecessary that the Administration is presenting a proposed budget to the Board and Budget Committee that would use $3.1M in reserves. Among other changes, their proposed budget would increase management staffing levels 10% above this year, which is also 10% above the historic maximum from a time when student enrollment was double the current level (See p. 4 of the Administration presentation to the Budget Committee last week). The budget as proposed would actually create a structural deficit. The Administration is seeking to make cuts of $1M to $3.2M per year for the next 4 years according to their presentation (see p. 7) at last week’s Budget Committee meeting due to a structural deficit that would only exist if the budget they proposed were approved and implemented.

More concerning are the assertions of the administration that they would make all decisions on cuts without the involvement of the Board of Education. This despite the statutory obligations and fiduciary duties of the publicly elected Board of Education and their Budget Committee, which provide public oversight and fulfills a critical function in our democracy.

The next Budget Committee meeting, when the Budget Committee may take action, is tomorrow, 5- 6 p.m. in the Boardroom. The meeting is open to the public.

In solidarity, 

Adrienne

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Recommendations and Essential Information for Budget Committee members

LCC Faculty Colleagues,

Please find below and attached essential information about the proposed FY26 budget. The Budget Committee, comprised of Board of Education members and their 7 community member appointees, will be meeting again today at 5 p.m. in the Boardroom.

In particular, please note the following.

It is entirely possible to balance the budget in a more reasonable, realistic, accurate manner, which the Administration, including all of the highest ranking administrator positions, and all stakeholder groups did collaboratively and with unanimous agreement just two weeks prior to the May 7 release of the dramatically changed budget.

Unfortunately, the Administration has already provided notice yesterday of one faculty retrenchment to take effect in Winter 2026 and appears to be implementing one partial retrenchment for next year as well. This is not necessary and is the direct result of the Administration adding excess expenditures, excess expense estimates and newly created positions as well as by making significant other changes to the proposed budget in a two week period prior to May 7, which create a budget that would use $3.1M in reserves, rather than presenting a balanced budget for the Board and Budget Committee to consider.

In solidarity,

Adrienne

Forecast Modeling Tool–FY25-29 a/o 05/01/25 BDS

Posted in General | Leave a comment